- "Do not ask for whom
the bell tolls, it tolls for thee," said the English poet, John Donne.
A shameful Austrian verdict bodes ill not only for the English
historian David Irving (sentenced to three years of gaol) but for our
freedom as well. Never has our feeling of justice been insulted like
this! When an occasional dissident was jailed in Brezhnev's Russia or
Ne Win's Burma, there was always an uproar of protest. Now the only
response to the Irving verdict is stunned silence. When they sent
innocent Muslims to the living hell of Guantanamo, we could think: they
are people of the Third World -- different rules apply. A Batista
policeman in Graham Greene's Our Man in Havana had said: some
people can be tortured, and some can not. When Ernst Zundel was
kidnapped in the US and brought to trial in Germany, we could think: it
is a German internal affair. Now an eminent man of letters, an author
of widely read and acclaimed books, a recognized European figure was
snatched from a civilised country and jailed for irreverence to the
Jews.
-
- Technically, David
Irving was sentenced for so-called "holocaust denial". But the concept
of Jewish holocaust being the only enforced dogma of supposedly secular
Europe has little to do with the Second World War and its atrocities.
It has everything to do with the Jewish claim of superiority and
exclusivity. There is a Jewish prayer saying: "Bless you, Lord, that
you created me a Jew, that you separated between Jews and the earth
folks, like you separated between the Holy and Profane, that our fate
is not like their fate". The Holocaust concept is just another form of
this prayer. They say that even their death is not like the death of
anybody else. We must deny the concept of Holocaust without doubt and
hesitation, even if every story of Holocaust down to the most fantastic
invention of Wiesel were absolutely true. Therefore the technical
discussions of Jewish mortality are perfectly legitimate but
superfluous, like the argument whether a whale could swallow Jonah is
superfluous for an atheist.
-
- The legal enforcers of
the Holocaust want us to bow down to the idol of Jewish superiority, or
else! They won't jail Deborah Lipstadt for denial of the
Holocaust of Dresden, or Guenter Lewy who penned a lengthy piece
entitled Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide? denying the
genocide of native Americans. The Jews produced and published these
denials for the same reason they published the Satanic Pictures - in
order to emphasise the difference between a goy and a Jew. They want
you to remember: you may profane Islam and Christianity, but not
Judaism. You may discount the suffering of anybody but the Jews.
-
- Thus, we should say:
David Irving was sentenced for denial of Jewish superiority. His doom
seals the reign of (albeit limited) freedom that began with the fall of
Bastille. European history went full circle: from rejecting the
rule of Church and embracing free thought, to the new Jewish
mind-control on a world scale. Not only is Western Christian
civilisation dead, but even its successor, secular European
civilisation, has met its demise only a few days after its proud and
last celebration by the Danish scribes. It was short-lived: about two
hundred years from beginning to the end, the Europeans may once have
had the illusion that they can live without an ideological
supremacy. Now this illusion is over; and the Jews came in the stead of
the old and tired See of St Peter to rule over the minds and souls of
Europeans.
-
- In 1962, Look magazine
invited founder of the Jewish state David Ben-Gurion to picture the
world 25 years into the future. He predicted that World Government
would already be in place by 1987, with the Supreme Court for Mankind
(the higher ecclesiastic body) would be established in Jerusalem, along
with a shrine there commemorating the Jewish role in the
bringing-together of mankind. He was mistaken by only a few years. The
world is not fully subdued yet, but it already knows its new master.
-
- In the 19th
century, Europeans could not fully colonise China. But there was
an obvious mark of their supremacy: the Settlement System. It divided
the residents of China into two categories: the supreme human beings
(the Europeans) and the lowly natives. A native who raised his hand
against a superior European was tried by European colonial law, a
European whose misdeed caused harm to a native was out of bounds of
native justice. This system of "settlements" was dismantled by Chairman
Mao after the Communist victory of 1949. Similar systems of colonial
justice went down with the colonial empires that employed them, and for
a short while afterwards, every country was sovereign over its land.
-
- Some time ago, the
Knesset of the Jewish State revived the Settlement System for the
non-yet-fully-colonised world: an offender against the Jews, wherever
he lives, wherever he commits his offence, can be brought to the Jewish
court. The offended Jew may have no connection whatsoever to the Jewish
State, the offence may be not considered an offence by the local
native law, but he still can be brought to Jewish justice in
Jerusalem. This law claimed supreme sovereignty of the Jews over the
rest of mankind. This law denied the sovereignty of all nations save
one. Such a claim had to be treated as any hostile attempt of the
nation's sovereignty: as an act of war. But it passed in silence due to
a marvellous Jewish invention: gradualness.
-
- This method was
explained by Amira Hass, the Haaretz correspondent in colonised
Palestine. She wrote: "If you throw a frog into boiling water, it will
jump out and save its life. But a frog swimming in room temperature
water that is gradually heated will grow used to the heat; by the time
the water boils, it's too late and the frog dies. In the development of
the Israeli system of control over the Palestinian people and their
land, the Israeli occupation has raised to the level of genius the use
of gradualness as a means of making people grow used to something."
This gradualness was used by the Jews - not only in regard to the
Palestinians.
-
- The Settlement
System started small: the Long Arm of the Jews snatched Adolf Eichmann
in Argentina and brought him to Jewish justice in Jerusalem.
Adolf Eichmann was a bad guy who did a lot of harm to Jews in a big
way, so many countries chose to disregard this grievous infringement of
Argentine sovereignty. And it was just the beginning:
-
- A few years later, the
Polish court demanded the extradition of a Jewish mass murderer,
Solomon Morel. This Morel tortured and killed with his own hands
hundreds of ethnic Germans in a concentration camp in postwar Poland.
His crimes were exposed by the late American journalist John Sack.
Morel escaped to Tel Aviv, and the Jewish state replied to the Polish
demand with imperial haughtiness: "What Chutzpah! These natives do not
know their place!" Probably, Queen Victoria would reply like that
if a native African chief were to demand the surrender of one of her
officials to his justice.
-
- Since then, every
country, big and small, has accepted the notion of the Jews being above
the law. The wealthy Russian Jewish crook Nevzlin escaped Russia
and lives peacefully in Tel Aviv, next to Flatto-Sharon, a
French-Jewish crook, not far from a murderer of a Canadian child,
within a reach from many other killers and crooks. A powerful Jewish
organisation called Khabad wrote in its charter: there should be no
Jews in goys' jails. By bribes and persuasion they release Jewish
criminals from jails and ship them to the Jewish state. The Khabad
founder, Lubawitsch Rebbe's birthday is celebrated as a holiday,
"Education Day," in the USA.
-
- In property cases Jews
are also above the law. Jewish property is sacrosanct. They have
demanded and received back all property that once belonged to Jews in
Germany, Austria, France, Baltic states. If a Jew had no heirs, his
property went to World Jewry. But 90% of goys' property was
confiscated by the Jewish state in 1948, and since then 50% of the
lands conquered in 1967. Even last year thousands of dunams of goys'
lands were taken over in Jerusalem area, for a goy has no real title to
property, according to Jewish law.
-
- A taste of Jewish
justice is provided in the case of an Israeli captain who murdered a
schoolgirl, 13, in full sight of his soldiers. He emptied his gun unto
her body and was found not guilty by the Jewish court. Actually, none
of the non-Jewish children' murderers (two hundred in the last
three years) was ever punished by a Jewish court. Not many of them were
even brought to justice, but whoever was got off lightly. The settler
Nachum Korman murdered a 10-year-old boy, Hilmi Shusha, in the village
of Hussan. He was apprehended, taken to the court and forensic evidence
against him was brought by the highest Israeli forensic institution,
but the judge dismissed the evidence and sentenced the murderer to six
months of social work. On mere suspicion of having committed such a
crime against a Jewish child, a goy gets a life sentence.
-
- Jewish justice makes
us look back at the Inquisition trials with some nostalgia. When
Galileo repented, he was allowed to continue his studies unhindered.
The repentance of Irving did not help him a bit. The judge said: "The
regret he showed was considered to be mere lip service to the law." And
"independent expert" Dina Porat, head of Tel Aviv University's
Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism, said
that "Irving's purported repentance is motivated by his fear of a
verdict that could amount to 10 years' imprisonment."
-
- Now, Jewish
justice is being enforced on a global scale. The European Jewish
Congress is set to file a complaint in the International Criminal Court
(ICC) in The Hague against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for
"incitement to genocide", but all attempts to bring Ariel Sharon to
justice predictably failed. The greater Jewish state, the US, also
adopted its smaller sister's idea of unlimited supreme sovereignty. An
offence against an American citizen can be brought to an American court
wherever it occurred. Surprisingly, this Imperial claim, akin to the
Settlement system of old, was also utilised mainly in the Jewish
interests. Whenever Jewish settlers -- American citizens -- were killed
in the course of the Middle Eastern conflict, American judges ruled
against the Palestinian National Authority, Iran, Hamas and the whole
world, and granted the victims' survivors multimillion dollar damages.
But nobody can sue the Jews: whether they kill Rachel Corrie, the
American peace activist, with a bulldozer in Gaza, or they strafe
American sailors on board USS Liberty or kill and maim American
Palestinians.
-
- With the Austrian
verdict, Jewish supremacy ceased to be a paranoid's nightmare, and
became a fact bound in law, like the Viking supremacy in Danelaw, in
East Anglia of old, with this one difference: the Jewish supremacy has
religious overtones while the Vikings relied upon their swords and
their dogs.
-
- This is openly
discussed in the Jewish world. "We live in the full blossom of Messiah
Days, free from our political adversaries and soon to be freed from the
satanic goys", Uriel Tal wrote. While Christians believe that the
Second Coming of Christ will usher a completely new world of miracles,
the Jewish view expressed by Maimonides is that the world in the Days
of Messiah will not differ much from the world we knew, except for
triumph of Jewish supremacy, Gedulath Israel (Hilchoth Teshuva 9:2).
Based on this understanding, the Sanhedrin, the Jewish supreme
religious court, was established a year ago to judge the world. It is
led by Rabbi Adin Steinzaltz, and the goyim who observe the Noahide
commandments made their obeisance to him.
-
- Some months ago I was
brought to the police station in my Jaffa and asked to answer the
complaint of the French Jewish organisation, LICRA.
-
- - "Did you write about
Jewish supremacy and world dominion?" a policeman asked.
-
- - "So what if I did?"
I replied. "Every second Rabbi has expressed this view."
-
- - "Yes, but they see
it in a positive light!" said the policeman.
-
- Thus there is no
argument about the fact of Jewish supremacy, only about its assessment.
If you think it is good, you may even be a US president -- if you think
it is bad, your place is in jail! Meanwhile, Jewish supremacy is hard
on those who challenge it as Irving did. Gradually -- oh ever so
gradually, so as not to frighten the frog from heating water -- the
screw will tighten.
-
- Eventually it may
become unpleasant: Jewish justice can give a handsome handicap to
its nearest competitor in ruthlessness, Genghis Khan. It is partial,
and proud of it. By Jewish law, a Jew vs. a Goy is always right, even
if he is wrong. The Europeans will feel the tender mercy of the
Jews, until now the exclusive privilege of Palestinians. There may well
be poetic justice in this turn of events.
-
- Ordinary Jews aren't
going to enjoy the new-old order of things. If there is something
Jewish justice likes even less than a goy, it's a stray Jew. Apostates,
that is Jews who turned to Christ, should be killed, according to
Maimonides. The extremely clement Rabbi Asher tore off the noses of
Jewish women who had intercourse with a goy, while Jewish men were
normally flogged for this transgression. Well, some obligations
coming with superior status.
-
- Christianity will
probably dwindle; only its Jew-worshipping sects, similar to the US
Christian Zionists, will survive. Others will be prosecuted for their
antisemitism and will be disbanded. The churches will be destroyed, in
accordance with the Jewish commandment. They should not be allowed to
compete with the Temple in Jerusalem which will be rebuilt on the ruins
of the al Aqsa Mosque. The rebuilding will be quite painless: after the
forthcoming attack on Iran, Muslims will have other things to worry
about -- for instance, their physical survival! This can't be
guaranteed, as they were proclaimed "Amalek", and their mass
annihilation is a religious duty of the Jews. The road to this future
is opened by the fateful ruling of the Austrians.
-
- Always looking for the
bright side of things: now the Europeans do not have to worry about the
dark prophecy of the Protocols. The rule of the Elders of Zion is
already upon us, and egad! -- it is not half as bad as we feared. At
least, not yet.
|
